• DSpace Universidad Indoamerica
  • Publicaciones Científicas
  • Artículos Científicos Indexados
  • Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://repositorio.uti.edu.ec//handle/123456789/3641
    Título : Comparison of traditional and DNA metabarcoding samples for monitoring tropical soil arthropods (Formicidae, Collembola and Isoptera)
    Autor : Basset, Yves
    Hajibabaei, Mehrdad
    Wright, Michael
    Castillo, Anakena
    Donoso, David
    Segar, Simon
    Souto-Vilarós, Daniel
    Soliman, Dina
    Roslin, Tomas
    Smith, M. Alex
    Lamarre, Greg
    León, Luis
    Decaëns, Thibaud
    Palacios-Vargas, José
    Castaño-Meneses, Gabriela
    Scheffrahn, Rudolf
    Rivera, Marleny
    Perez, Filonila
    Bobadilla, Ricardo
    Lopez, Yacksecari
    Ramirez Silva, José Alejandro
    Montejo Cruz, Maira
    Angela Arango Galván, Angela
    Barrios, Héctor
    Fecha de publicación : 2022
    Editorial : Scientific Reports. Volume 12
    Resumen : The soil fauna of the tropics remains one of the least known components of the biosphere. Long-term monitoring of this fauna is hampered by the lack of taxonomic expertise and funding. These obstacles may potentially be lifted with DNA metabarcoding. To validate this approach, we studied the ants, springtails and termites of 100 paired soil samples from Barro Colorado Island, Panama. The fauna was extracted with Berlese-Tullgren funnels and then either sorted with traditional taxonomy and known, individual DNA barcodes (“traditional samples”) or processed with metabarcoding (“metabarcoding samples”). We detected 49 ant, 37 springtail and 34 termite species with 3.46 million reads of the COI gene, at a mean sequence length of 233 bp. Traditional identification yielded 80, 111 and 15 species of ants, springtails and termites, respectively; 98%, 37% and 100% of these species had a Barcode Index Number (BIN) allowing for direct comparison with metabarcoding. Ants were best surveyed through traditional methods, termites were better detected by metabarcoding, and springtails were equally well detected by both techniques. Species richness was underestimated, and faunal composition was different in metabarcoding samples, mostly because 37% of ant species were not detected. The prevalence of species in metabarcoding samples increased with their abundance in traditional samples, and seasonal shifts in species prevalence and faunal composition were similar between traditional and metabarcoding samples. Probable false positive and negative species records were reasonably low (13–18% of common species). We conclude that metabarcoding of samples extracted with Berlese-Tullgren funnels appear suitable for the long-term monitoring of termites and springtails in tropical rainforests. For ants, metabarcoding schemes should be complemented by additional samples of alates from Malaise or light traps.
    URI : https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-14915-2
    http://repositorio.uti.edu.ec//handle/123456789/3641
    Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos Científicos Indexados

    Ficheros en este ítem:
    No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.


    Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons