Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://repositorio.uti.edu.ec//handle/123456789/4855
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC | Valor | Lengua/Idioma |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Bonilla-Bedoya, Santiago | - |
dc.contributor.author | Valencia, Kevin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Herrera, Miguel Ángel | - |
dc.contributor.author | López-Ulloa, Magdalena | - |
dc.contributor.author | Donoso, David | - |
dc.contributor.author | Macedo Pezzopane, José Eduardo | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-26T03:04:23Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-03-26T03:04:23Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X23002339 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.uti.edu.ec//handle/123456789/4855 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Biological indicators of soil quality express the capacity of a soil to maintain its ecosystem functions and services between socio-ecosystem inflection thresholds; therefore, they are determinants in management and land use decisions. However, their development until a few decades ago was limited for several reasons: reductionism and early development of other dimensions, such as physical and chemical indicators or their methodological complexity, thus affecting the importance given to biological factors and the integral evaluation of soil quality or health. Thus, this review presents a mapping of the scientific contributions of the last 50 years oriented to the theoretical and methodological development of biological indicators of soil quality, identifying their development and application in these decades. We conducted a bibliometric analysis that allowed us to present an overview of the field with respect to scientific production: temporality, geographical origin, institutional origin, journals that promote the development of the field, articles with greater influence by citation in the field of study, and the co-occurrences of these indicators in research. This analysis was complemented at the second stage by a systematic review of the literature with the greatest impact by citation. We found 2320 scientific papers distributed mainly in the United States (17.8%), China (12.2%), Brazil (8.3%), India (6.3%), and European Mediterranean countries, such as Spain, France, and Italy (14.2%). Our review showed 25 biological indicators with the highest occurrence; for example, microbial biomass (1 1 8), enzymatic activity (90), and organic matter (78); other indicators, such as earthworms, nematodes, or springtails, are also reported. All indicators showed relationships, to a greater or lesser extent, with soil biodiversity and its functions in the landscape. Important advances in soil indicators have developed gradually in the last few decades, with scientific efforts mainly concentrated in developed and emerging countries. In the last decade, the production curve continues with a growth trend., and research questions in the field revolve around the linkage of diversity and function from a molecular point of view. The scope goes beyond productivity, manifesting the real need to conserve and manage the ecosystem services of a limited and non-renewable natural resource. Pioneering research should begin to report on the scope of soil biological monitoring and its influence on policy, management, and land use. Finally, the promotion of research networks with developing countries can foster the development of regional and local soil monitoring policies in these regions | es |
dc.language.iso | eng | es |
dc.publisher | Ecological Indicators. Volume 148 | es |
dc.rights | openAccess | es |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | es |
dc.title | Mapping 50 years of contribution to the development of soil quality biological indicators | es |
dc.type | article | es |
Aparece en las colecciones: | Artículos Científicos Indexados |
Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons