Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repositorio.uti.edu.ec//handle/123456789/3185
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSuárez-Monzón, Noemí-
dc.contributor.authorRequeiro, Reinaldo-
dc.contributor.authorUrosa, Belén-
dc.contributor.authorCáceres, Maritza-
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-19T15:07:21Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-19T15:07:21Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-50062021000300037&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.uti.edu.ec//handle/123456789/3185-
dc.description.abstractThe main objective of this study was to determine trends in the evaluation of university professors by performing a systematic review of 32 research studies between the years 2008 and 2019. A thematic content analysis was used and five trends were identified: 1) macro-policies contextualized into micro-policies, 2) promotional evaluations transitioned to formative and developmental evaluations, 3) using student criteria as a participatory approach, 4) moving from one-dimensional to multidimensional approaches, and 5) switching from an administrative routine process to a strategic process for professors and institutions. Based on the results, critical issues are discussed, including their contributions to the decision making process of policy evaluation. It is concluded that additional studies are needed on policy contextualization processes, evaluation mechanisms, and methodological validation by taking into account regional specificity.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherFormacion Universitaria. Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 37 - 46es
dc.rightsopenAccesses
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/es
dc.titleEvaluation of University Professors. Trends and Critical Issueses
dc.typearticlees
Appears in Collections:Artículos Científicos Indexados

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons